|
EPA and CDC Host Conference on IPM and Tick-Borne Disease March 5-6, 2013
|
|
EPA and CDC Host Conference on IPM and Tick-Borne Disease March 5-6, 2013
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Centers for Disease Control will co-host the Tick-Borne Disease Integrated Pest Management (TBD-IPM) Conference on March 5-6, 2013, at the EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs in Arlington, VA (2777 South Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202).
- March 5: Federal Partners Only (Room S4370/4380)
- March 6: Researchers, Partners, Stakeholders and the Public (1st Floor Conference Center)
The main objective of the conference is to identify IPM research initiatives for the prevention of tick-borne diseases. Over 40 federal agency representatives and researchers will present the results of research on TBD-IPM. The keynote speaker is Dr. David Walker from the University of Texas Medical Branch and National Academy of Sciences. Invited guests include Dr. Willy Burgdorfer, NIH Emeritus, world renowned for discovery of Borrelia burgdorferi, the pathogen that causes Lyme disease.
This conference builds upon the 2011 Promoting Community IPM for Preventing Tick-Borne Diseases conference. The 2011 conference captured the research and information surrounding prevention of tick-borne diseases from the perspective of government and non-government stakeholders.
Conference agenda highlights include:
- Identify research strategies to support community IPM programs
- Facilitate collaboration among federal partners to support research initiatives
- Provide information on current tick IPM research, i.e., targeted management of ticks, tools for predicting and communicating potential risk, mapping and risk-based modeling for decision support for IPM and measuring the success of Tick IPM
Conference seating is on a first-come basis. For more information about the conference, please visit http://www.epa.gov/pestwise/events/2013_tick_meeting.html
EPA Makes Available U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Final Biological Opinion for Kaput-D Prairie Dog Bait
|
|
The EPA has posted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's final Biological Opinion for Kaput-D Prairie Dog Bait on its Endangered Species Protection Program website at www.epa.gov/espp as well as in the public docket at www.regulations.gov under docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0739. In its Biological Opinion, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has concluded that Kaput-D Prairie Dog Bait is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of endangered species when used with appropriate conservation measures.
The conservation measures for Kaput-D, which include prohibition of use in certain areas, restrictions on the timing of application in other areas, and requirements for enhanced searches to remove poisoned prairie dogs, are identical to those specified by FWS in the April 9, 2012, “no jeopardy” Biological Opinion for Rozol Prairie Dog Bait (a similar anticoagulant rodenticide prairie dog bait containing chlorphacinone) at http://epa.gov/espp/2012/borozol-final.pdf. These conservation measures for Kaput-D became effective when the one-year time limited registration was granted by the EPA on October 25, 2012.
This final Biological Opinion is a result of the EPA’s formal request to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to consult on the one-year registration of Kaput-D Prairie Dog Bait. This end-use product contains the active ingredient diphacinone and is expected to be of interest to ranchers and applicators in western states.
Officials call for limits on use of super-toxic rat poison
|
|
D-CON kills rats and mice, the label reads. And, according to state and federal officials, it can kill hawks, owls, eagles, foxes, bobcats, mountain lions and other non-targeted wildlife too.
So can competing brands. Pesticide manufacturers have been selling a new generation of more potent anticoagulants because mice and rats have built up some resistance to the old standby warfarin.
These super-toxic rat poisons have a longer half-life before they break down, meaning they are more effective at working their way up the food chain -- not only killing rodents but their natural predators.
The California Department of Fish and Game has confirmed 240 cases of non-targeted wildlife being exposed to the anticoagulants that work by causing animals to bleed to death.
Comment Period Open for Proposed Guidance on Antimicrobial Pesticide Products with Mold-Related Label Claims
|
|
The EPA is seeking public comment on a draft Pesticide Registration Notice (PRN) that proposes guidance to applicants and registrants concerning product performance (efficacy) and labeling for “mold-related” antimicrobial pesticide products. Mold-related pesticides are antimicrobial pesticides that bear a label claim to inhibit or destroy mold or mildew growth on hard, nonporous and porous surfaces in indoor environments.
Certain molds can cause a variety of adverse health effects, and the EPA wants to ensure that consumers have better product information with which to make an informed choice when selecting mold-related products that best suit their needs. For example, after a hurricane, consumers and first responders should be able to better understand which mold-related products are right for the job. Once implemented, this guidance should improve protection of public health through proper labeling of mold-related pesticides and by ensuring label claims are supported by valid efficacy data.
The agency registers a wide variety of mold-related pesticides products used for mold remediation and mold prevention, and products used in heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC&R) systems. The draft notice explains when the agency would expect to require applicants or registrants to submit efficacy data in support of the label claims of certain mold-related pesticides. The draft notice also describes labeling of mold-related pesticides so that products intended only for aesthetic purposes would be clearly distinguishable from products intended for public health purposes.
The EPA is requesting comments on the draft Pesticide Registration Notice. Comments can be submitted at www.regulations.gov in Docket ID # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0539 until February 11, 2013.
The draft Pesticide Registration Notice is located at www.regulations.gov at
Document ID # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0539-0081.
The Federal Register Notice of this action published on December 12, 2012, and is available at www.regulations.gov at Document ID # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0539-0001.
Focus Meetings Offer New Early Opportunities for Stakeholder Involvement in Pesticide Registration Review
|
|
Focus Meetings Offer New Early Opportunities for Stakeholder Involvement in Pesticide Registration Review
In an ongoing effort to enhance transparency and involvement, the EPA has instituted Focus Meetings as a new step for certain pesticides going through registration review, the agency's periodic reevaluation of all pesticides to make sure that as the ability to assess risks to human health and the environment evolves and as policies and practices change, all pesticide products in the marketplace can still be used safely. Focus Meetings provide an additional opportunity for stakeholder engagement early in the registration review process. This early involvement can help ensure that the EPA has important information prior to developing risk assessments for registration review.
The meetings, which typically involve registrants and others, are intended to address areas of uncertainty such as unclear labels or missing studies that could affect the EPA's pesticide risk assessment and risk management decisions. By obtaining better information early in the process, the EPA can narrow the scope of pesticide reevaluations to areas that pose real concerns, based on current data and use patterns. Better understanding of use patterns, for example, could reduce or eliminate the need for additional studies, or eliminate overly conservative assumptions that would lead to rework later in the process. Designed to improve efficiency, Focus Meetings will help ensure that the EPA has the best available data and information early in the process for making informed registration review decisions.
To ensure transparency, materials associated with Focus Meetings will be available in the pesticide-specific registration review dockets. For cases where a Focus Meeting is held prior to the opening of a chemical-specific docket, OPP has opened a special Focus Meetings docket, EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0778, at www.regulations.gov.
Further information about Focus Meetings is available on the EPA's registration review Web page, http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review/focus-meetings.html.
Soil Fumigant Phase 2 Labels Take Effect
Monday, 03 December 2012 01:00 | Last Updated on Saturday, 22 December 2012 03:06 | Written by EPA Pesticide Program Update |
| |
EPA Announces Chlorpyrifos Spray Drift Measures
Monday, 30 July 2012 21:48 | Last Updated on Monday, 30 July 2012 22:54 | Written by Aubrey Harris |
| |
EPA Announces Chlorpyrifos Spray Drift Measures
EPA announced last week new mitigation measures for spray applications of chlorpyrifos. In 2007, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Pesticide Action Network North America submitted a petition to revoke all tolerances and cancel all registrations for chlorpyrifos. Though EPA did not address the other claims in the petition, EPA did say that this action was intended to partly address claims in that petition relating to inhalation exposure.
Buffer zones are now necessary when applying the product in areas frequented by non-occupational bystanders. Companies manufacturing pesticides that use chlorpyrifos have voluntarily agreed to adhere to new labeling and a reduction in the rates of pesticide applied. Chlorpyrifos is used to control pests on food crops and non-food sites such as golf courses and wood products. They have also been effective as a fogger treatment to abate adult mosquitoes. In the petition, the environmental organizations alleged that chlorpyrifos impacts the neurological development of children. (Contact: Nathan Bowen- This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , Written by: Aubrey Harris) Benefits Assessment on Insecticide Azinphos Methyl
Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:30 | Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 November 1999 01:00 | Written by EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs |
| |
In This Update:
Benefits Assessment on Insecticide Azinphos MethylToday the EPA posted an updated grower impacts assessment for the remaining uses of the organophosphate insecticide azinphos-methyl (AZM). According to a voluntary phase-out agreement from November 2006, use of AZM is being gradually phased out due to concerns about worker exposure and ecological effects. Consistent with the agreement, the EPA is in the process of conducting a risk-benefit analysis to determine whether to maintain or amend the September 30, 2012, effective date for cancellation of the remaining AZM uses. The EPA’s risk assessment, completed in connection with the 2006 decision, remains unchanged. The agency's recently revised analysis of the net costs to growers remains generally similar to the costs estimated in 2006. The EPA expects to announce by September 30, 2012, a determination as to whether any changes in the cancellation order are warranted.
For a copy of the assessment, please visit the azinphos-methyl page in Chemical Search, www.epa.gov/pesticides/chemicalsearch/ , or docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0365 at www.regulations.gov . Final Rule: Synchronizing the Expiration Dates of the Pesticide Applicator Certificate with the Underlying State or Tribal Certificate
Monday, 16 July 2012 22:41 | Last Updated on Monday, 16 July 2012 22:46 | Written by EPA Pesticide Program Update |
| |
Federal Register linik: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0049-0006 SUMMARY: This final rule will reduce burden to restricted use pesticide applicators and simplify federal certification expiration dates. Restricted use pesticides (RUPs) are those which may generally cause unreasonable adverse effects on the environment without additional restrictions. RUPs may only be applied by or under the direct supervision of an applicator certified as competent by a certifying agency. A State, tribe, or Federal agency becomes a certifying agency by receiving approval from EPA on their certification plan. In areas not covered by a certifying agency, EPA may establish a Federal certification plan and issue Federal certificates directly. One way EPA may issue a Federal certificate is based on an existing valid certificate from a certifying agency, and this final rule will synchronize the expiration dates on the Federal certificate with that of the certifying agency certificate on which the Federal certificate is based. |
Tribal Pesticide Specialist Position - Region 5There is a Tribal Pesticide Specialist position open for a Senior Environmental Employee (SEE) through NAPCA (the National Asian Pacific Center on Aging). NAPCA is one of the organizations that helps find interested professionals age 55 and older to assist EPA in accomplishing its work. Please share this job opportunity with anyone who might be interested in this part-time position (20-30 hours/week). Potential applicants would need to be in Region 5, but do not necessarily have to be in the Chicago metro commuting area. Note that although NAPCA's mission is to serve the Asian American and Pacific Islander community, job postings are not limited to members of those communities. A minimum age requirement must be met. Department of Pesticide Regulation Air Monitoring Reports
Friday, 20 July 2012 02:23 | Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 November 1999 01:00 | Written by Randy Segawa |
| |
The Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) has released two air monitoring reports, one draft report for public comment and one final report. Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review and Comment and Other Actions
Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:22 | Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:25 | Written by US EPA |
| |
Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review and Comment and Other Actions Date: 07/092012
Citation: Volume 77, Number 119, Pages 40048-40051
Purpose: EPA has established registration review dockets for the pesticides listed in the table in Unit III.A. With this document, EPA is opening the public comment period for these registration reviews. Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment.
Chemicals: Various
Comments: Due by August 19, 2012;
Docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-1009-0001
Contact: Kevin Costello, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs; (703);
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Monsanto's Roundup Altering the Physical Shape of Amphibians
Tuesday, 10 July 2012 23:11 | Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 November 1999 01:00 | Written by Mike Barrett |
| |
Source: Nation of Change Monsanto's Roundup, which is the most popular herbicide used today, has been found to ignite morphological changes in amphibians. The research, conducted using tadpoles, found that environmentally relevant concentrations of Roundup are enough to cause two species of amphibians to actually change shape. This is the first research to show that herbicides can have such an affect on animals. Setting up outdoor tanks closely resembling the environment of natural wetlands, study researcher Rick Relyea, University of Pittsburgh professor of biological sciences in the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences and director of Pitt's Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, added 3 tadpoles to each tank and exposed them to a range of Roundup concentrations over a 3 week period. The cages also contained large predators, which naturally cause changes in tadpole morphology. These natural changes include a larger tail, due to chemical emissions. While it wasn't surprising to see morphological changes take part due to the naturally emitted chemicals from predators, it was rather shocking to find out that Roundup had the same effects — causing the tails of the tadpoles to grow in size. What's more, the combination of the naturally emitted chemicals and Roundup caused the tadpoles' tails to grow twice as large. Seeing as tadpoles alter body shape in order to properly survive in its environment, the forced changes from herbicides like Roundup can put the animals at a disadvantage. |
Tribal Pesticide PSA
|
Upcoming Events
Upcoming Calls
|
Upcoming Meetings
|
FIFRA Events
|
Upcoming Grants
|
Training
|
Did you know that tribal pesticide programs were some of the first tribal EPA programs, dating back to the 1970's? Tribes have always been interested on the impact of pesticides to our health, our food, and our cultural heritage. The Tribal Pesticide Program Council (TPPC) is comprised of over 30 Tribes nationally who are committed to raising pesticide related issues to the national stage. Please look around at our new website and feel free to contact us with any questions or suggestions.
